Member Sign In
International Coalition for the Responsibility to Protect
PDF Print E-mail
Waging war can become a bad habit
Paul Robinson
Ottawa Citizen
14 March 2011
Paul Robinson is a professor in the Graduate School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Ottawa, and the author of Military Honour in the Conduct of War: From Ancient Greece to Iraq. He has served as an officer in both the British and Canadian armies.
(…) Amid calls to create a "no-fly zone" over Libya and lend military aid to the Libyan rebels, the idea of redemptive violence holds many in its sway. We ought to know better. In recent years we have seen more than enough evidence to convince rational people that waging war to make the world a better place most often does the opposite.
Maybe our intervention in Libya would save the rebels, oust Gadhafi, and institute peace, order and good government in short order. However, the U.S. director of national intelligence James Clapper told Congress last week that Gadhafi would probably win. Intervening on behalf of rebels who we think are bound to lose makes no strategic sense at all. Intervention would not bring about the victory of order over chaos, but instead would only make a bad situation even worse. (…)
(…) There is a natural tendency in war for the military and political goals to diverge -the aim of military action becomes more and more to gain an identifiable military victory rather than to achieve the political objective for which the war was supposedly started. We may start a war in order to fulfill some "responsibility to protect," but, as the bombardment of Yugoslavia in 1999 showed, once we have started it, protecting people takes a back seat to beating the enemy. Humanitarian intervention ceases to be humanitarian the moment that the first bomb drops.
Torn between a desire to intervene and a fear of the consequences, in the case of Libya, we will all too likely resort to half-measures. A nofly zone, in particular, seems particularly ill-suited to a conflict unfolding primarily on the ground. If the aim of the intervention is to remove Gadhafi, then force must be used in a manner which directly removes Gadhafi. Botched half-measures will merely ensure that the regime stays in power, but, like Iraq in the 1990s, becomes isolated by the world, subject to regular air strikes, and ground ever further into poverty and oppression. It is hard to see how that would benefit either the Libyan people or us. (…)

Browse Documents by Region:

International Coalition for the Responsibility to Protect
c/o World Federalist Movement - Institute for Global Policy
708 Third Avenue, Suite 1715, New York, NY 10017