Member Sign In
International Coalition for the Responsibility to Protect
PDF Print E-mail
Fighting incitement to crimes against humanity
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
11 February 2013
 
A multi-layered approach to countering hate speech that could incite genocide and other crimes against humanity is needed, given the limits of legislation and the imperative to preserve freedom of expression, a United Nations official dealing with the issue told at a panel recently.(…)
In the panel, participants agreed that the topic of genocide and incitement to such atrocity crimes remained critical not only because of the importance of the issue in the founding of the UN after the Holocaust, but also because of the role of speech in the more recent atrocities in Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia and in the widespread violence triggered by the anti-Islam movie in 2012. (…)
For an effective multi-layered approach, Dieng said, legislation must be complemented with fighting the root causes of hate speech – racism and discrimination – through dialogue and other measures, as well as countering it with “positive speech,” from government as well as civil society, while improving national and international early warning of build-up of hate, for instance through the monitoring of new media.
Dieng, who was formerly the Registrar for the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, said he personally witnessed the role that hate speech can play in instigating atrocities and conversely the role that prevention could play in stopping such crimes.
However, he cautioned, outlawing speech should be exceptional, since “advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence (article 20 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights) – the most extreme form of hate speech – usually happens only in extraordinary circumstances.”
The factors that make speech “dangerous,” as well as the dangerousness of hate speech had been identified in several initiatives, he said. These include the severity, content, extent, imminence, likelihood, and context of the speech.(…)
Participants in the discussion held at UN Headquarters in New York on 1 February included the Ambassador of Norway, Geir O. Pedersen, the UN Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression, Frank LaRue, a fellow on genocide prevention at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, Susan Benesch, and experts on media ethics and related issues.
Dieng highlighted the importance of a seminar organized by his office at the Palais des Nations in Geneva on 22 February, which will aim to identify policy options for stopping and preventing incitement to atrocity crimes in situations where violence is imminent.
With the participation of the UN special rapporteurs on the freedom of opinion and expression; on the freedom of religion or belief; and on racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, the seminar is part of ongoing work to build on the 2012 Rabat Plan of Action on the prohibition of advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence. (…)
 
See the full article here.
 
 

Browse Documents by Region:

International Coalition for the Responsibility to Protect
c/o World Federalist Movement - Institute for Global Policy
708 Third Avenue, Suite 1715, New York, NY 10017
Contact