Member Sign In
International Coalition for the Responsibility to Protect
PDF Print E-mail
R2P How to make the international system more responsive?
European Union Institute for Security Studies
24 November 2008

The European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS) is an EU think tank agency that works under the EUs Second Pillar of Common Foreign and Security Policy.

The EUISS organised a Panel Discussion in New York on 24 November 2008 on the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in cooperation with the Liaison Office of the General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union with the United Nations, and with the collaboration of the Center on International Cooperation, New York University. ()

Enshrined by the Outcome Document of the 2005 World Summit, the principle of R2P is still subject to much debate. The Panel addressed some of the fundamental questions relating to the content and implementation of R2P, for example looking at whether the formulation of this concept has made a difference in the international response of states and international organisations to mass atrocities, and whether greater clarity on the principle would lead to better implementation or rather unnecessarily complicate states responses.

It was considered that the reference to R2P in the Outcome Document has not led to a higher engagement of the main global actors, including the EU, in the response to ongoing massacres. Doubts were cast as to whether the debate on the concept will lead to more resources at national or international level as the principle already exists under international law and R2P does not entail new mechanisms or rules. However, it was considered valuable by some participants for public awareness reasons.

Concerns were raised over the possibility that the debate on R2P at the UN General Assembly, when it considers a draft report on the subject by the UN Secretary General in March, will get caught up with disagreements over Security Council representation, as well as opposition from some emerging powers to openly refer to coercion for upholding human rights obligations, and fears of unbalanced application to different states depending on their political power.

Source :[tt_news]=1150&tx_ttnews[backPid]=1&cHash=65ad864942

Browse Documents by Region:

International Coalition for the Responsibility to Protect
c/o World Federalist Movement - Institute for Global Policy
708 Third Avenue, Suite 1715, New York, NY 10017